Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Pixtral Large
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 32.9.
- Pixtral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 32.2 |
| Released | — | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
Math Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Pixtral Large?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.2 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.