Model comparison
Command R+ vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Cohere
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Command R+ scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 9.2.
- Command R+ has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Cohere | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 42.5 |
| Released | 2024-08-30 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $10 | — |
| Results tracked | 34 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 29.1 (#309), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1187 | 1390 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 33.8% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 19.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 41.9% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 56.7% | — |
| MBPP+ | 63.5% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 9.2 (#344), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1186 | 1399 |
| SimpleBench | 17.4% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 24.8% | — |
| DTBench | 54.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 38.1% | — |
| LMCA | 5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.34 | — |
| LiveBench | 31.8% | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 28.9 (#242), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1188 | 1414 |
| LiveBench Math | 21.3% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 36.4 (#169), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1174 | 1395 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.9% | — |
| MMLU | 69.4% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 38.6 (#227), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1216 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1226 | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | 1138 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1227 | 1385 |
| LMArena French | 1209 | — |
| LMArena German | 1216 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1166 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1189 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 60.0 (#254), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1197 | 1374 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 57.6% | — |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 37.3 (#219), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1230 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Command R+: 43.5 (#228), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Command R+ | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1229 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1235 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1213 | 1393 |
| LiveBench Language | 29.7% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Command R+ better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Command R+ or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Command R+ and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Command R+ has 34 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.