Model comparison
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 35.5.
- Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | IBM | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 42.5 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 34.5 (#233), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1186 | 1390 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 24.1 (#120), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 27.1% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 22.1 (#207), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1145 | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 33.0 (#209), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1152 | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 31.1 (#220), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1142 | 1395 |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 30.9 (#260), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1099 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1145 | 1425 |
| LMArena Russian | 1092 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1406 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 58.6 (#259), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1131 | 1374 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.2 (#241), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1162 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Granite 3.1 8b Instruct: 35.5 (#266), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109)
| Benchmark | Granite 3.1 8b Instruct | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1150 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1129 | 1392 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1108 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Granite 3.1 8b Instruct or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Granite 3.1 8b Instruct and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Granite 3.1 8b Instruct has 13 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.