Model comparison
Falcon-180B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 6 shared benchmarks.
Technology Innovation Institute
TencentSummary
- They share 6 benchmarks with published results for both. Falcon-180B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.7 to 29.3.
- Falcon-180B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Technology Innovation Institute | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-09-06 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1007 | 1399 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 111.89 | — |
| HellaSwag | 89% | — |
| LAMBADA | 79.8% | — |
| PIQA | 84.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 87.1% | — |
Math Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
| GSM8K | 54.4% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 67.8% | — |
| BoolQ | 89% | — |
| MMLU | 70.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 64.2% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1047 | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Falcon-180B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Falcon-180B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1054 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1089 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1013 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Falcon-180B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Falcon-180B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
6 benchmarks have published results for both models. Falcon-180B has 16 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.