Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Mistral Large

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Mistral Large Mistral AI

31.9

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Mistral Large in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 18.2.
  • Mistral Large has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index42.531.9
Released—2024-02-26
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Mistral Large: 34.3 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Coding13901277
SciCode—36.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct—30%
LiveBench Coding—47.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—38.3%
ALE-Bench—264.7
HumanEval+—62.2%
MBPP+—59.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Mistral Large: 28.6 (#89)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—38.4%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Mistral Large: 15.8 (#310)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Hard Prompts13991257
SimpleBench—22.5%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—43.5%
DTBench—65.1%
LiveBench Data Analysis—50.1%
LMCA—16.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—128.52
ForecastBench—57.1
LiveBench—48.4%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Mistral Large: 18.2 (#291)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Math14141262
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.5%
Omni-MATH—28.1%
LiveBench Math—42.5%
MATH Level 5—50.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0.3%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Mistral Large: 30.1 (#230)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Expert13951232
GPQA Diamond—51.3%
MMLU-Pro—59.9%
Confabulations—21.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.5%
GPQA (HELM)—43.5%
MMLU—80%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Mistral Large: 40.0 (#219)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Non-English13951237
LMArena Chinese14251240
LMArena Korean14061202
LMArena Russian13851257
LMArena French—1325
LMArena German—1254
LMArena Japanese—1188
LMArena Spanish—1268

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Mistral Large: 67.9 (#191)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Instruction Following13741249
LiveBench Instruction Following—67.9%
IFEval—87.7%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Mistral Large: 38.3 (#199)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Longer Query13841261

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Mistral Large: 40.7 (#242)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Mistral Large
LMArena Text14011266
LMArena Creative Writing13921243
LMArena Multi-Turn13931260
Short-Story Creative Writing—69%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—985
WildBench—80.1%
LiveBench Language—39.4%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Mistral Large?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Mistral Large better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 34.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Mistral Large share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Large has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper