Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 36.0 to 21.0.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 31.8 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.2 (#276), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1389 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.3 (#101), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.2 (#307), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1399 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.49 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 21.0 (#273), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#250), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.9 (#160), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1395 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.8 (#179), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1375 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#157), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.7 (#205), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1393 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.