Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen3-4B

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 28.5 to 19.2.
  • Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index42.531.9
Released—2025-04-29
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked136

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
LMArena Coding1390—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles—4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1399—

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LMArena Math1414—

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1395—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1395—
LMArena Chinese1425—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1385—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1374—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1384—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen3-4B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Qwen3-4B
LMArena Text1401—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen3-4B?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen3-4B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper