Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Magistral Small
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 27.3 to 6.9.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 41.8 | 29.9 |
| Released | — | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129), Magistral Small: 37.8 (#172)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1389 | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106), Magistral Small: 6.9 (#345)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | — |
| DTBench | — | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 133.19 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132), Magistral Small: 24.9 (#253)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 30% |
| LMArena Math | 1414 | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#215)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1424 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1403 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1384 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1375 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Magistral Small?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 29.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Magistral Small better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 37.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Magistral Small share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.