Model comparison
Codestral vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 40.2 to 26.9.
- Codestral has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 30.1 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2024-05-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.90 | — |
| Results tracked | 7 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codestral: 26.9 (#316), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 11.1% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 41.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 52.5% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 137.78 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 73.8% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.9% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Codestral: 19.1 (#244), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 32.5% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Codestral: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Codestral | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Codestral better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 30.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Codestral or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 26.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Codestral and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Codestral has 7 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.