Model comparison
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite vs Magistral Small
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher in 3 categories and Magistral Small in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 27.8 to 6.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-1: 53.5% for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and 5% for Magistral Small.
- Magistral Small is cheaper at $0.50 / $1.50 per million input/output tokens, against $0.30 / $2.50 for Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 128K.
- Magistral Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 41.5 | 30.2 |
| Released | 2026-07-21 | 2025-06-10 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 1.05M | 128K |
| Max output | 66K | 40K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $0.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2.50 | $1.50 |
| Results tracked | 39 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.4 (#104), Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 41.3% | 35.2% |
| LMArena WebDev | 1440 | — |
| WeirdML | 39% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1453 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 765.27 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#107), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 29.3% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 10% | — |
Reasoning Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#114), Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 10.3% | 0% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 53.5% | 5% |
| CritPt | 0% | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 22% | 3% |
| DTBench | 83.5% | 61.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 145.13 | 133.19 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 6.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 60.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1441 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 19% | — |
| LMCA | 37.6% | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.9 (#264), Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 71.1% | 30% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 26% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 0% | — |
| ProofBench | 13% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1433 | — |
Knowledge Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.1 (#72), Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.3% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1435 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 41.1 (#40), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1268 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.5 (#63), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1469 | — |
| LMArena French | 1451 | — |
| LMArena German | 1454 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1427 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1443 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1442 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 74.8 (#85), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.9 (#84), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1435 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.2 (#57), Magistral Small: —
| Benchmark | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite | Magistral Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1435 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1420 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1559 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1445 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better than Magistral Small?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.2 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Magistral Small?
Magistral Small is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $1.50 per million output tokens; Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite lists at $0.30 and $2.50.
Is Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite or Magistral Small better for coding?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 38.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite does, with 1.05M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite and Magistral Small share?
9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 39 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Small has 10.