Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Qwen1.5-32B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-32B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 34.2.
- Qwen1.5-32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 30.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1130 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1155 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1126 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| MMLU | — | 74.4% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1177 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1073 |
| LMArena French | — | 1101 |
| LMArena German | — | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1027 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1089 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1116 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1140 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Qwen1.5-32B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.