Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Llama 4 Scout

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Llama 4 Scout Meta

27.7

Rank #330 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 4 Scout in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 37.0.
  • Llama 4 Scout has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index42.527.7
Released—2025-04-05
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.30
Results tracked1343

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Llama 4 Scout: 20.2 (#339)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Coding13901286
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—9.1%
SciCode—17%
BigCodeBench Complete—43.1%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 4 Scout: 24.6 (#119)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.1%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Llama 4 Scout: 9.1 (#345)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Hard Prompts13991266
ARC-AGI-2—0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—36.9%
ARC-AGI-1—0.5%
CritPt—0%
DTBench—57.9%
LMCA—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129.64
ForecastBench—57.5

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Llama 4 Scout: 19.6 (#286)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Math14141287
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.8%
Omni-MATH—37.3%
MATH Level 5—62.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—0%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Llama 4 Scout: 31.9 (#217)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Expert13951235
GPQA Diamond—51.8%
MMLU-Pro—74.2%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—7.7%
GPQA (HELM)—50.7%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 4 Scout: 32.2 (#102)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Vision—1118
SpatialViz-Bench—34.2%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Llama 4 Scout: 41.0 (#212)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Non-English13951252
LMArena Chinese14251255
LMArena Korean14061207
LMArena Russian13851263
LMArena French—1282
LMArena German—1272
LMArena Japanese—1206
LMArena Spanish—1278

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Llama 4 Scout: 65.8 (#217)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Instruction Following13741248
IFEval—81.8%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Llama 4 Scout: 27.5 (#294)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Longer Query13841265
Fiction.LiveBench—36%

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Llama 4 Scout: 37.0 (#261)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 4 Scout
LMArena Text14011279
LMArena Creative Writing13921249
LMArena Multi-Turn13931280
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—783
WildBench—78%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Llama 4 Scout?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Llama 4 Scout better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Llama 4 Scout share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 4 Scout has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper