Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 59.5 to 27.6.
  • Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct specifications
Hunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
ProviderTencentMicrosoft
Noometry Index42.527.9
Released—2024-04-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1335

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Coding13901093
LiveBench Coding—15.5%
HumanEval+—59.1%
MBPP+—54.2%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts13991072
Chess Puzzles—0%
LiveBench Reasoning—26.8%
LiveBench Data Analysis—34.7%
Adversarial NLI—52.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
HellaSwag—76.7%
LiveBench—22.4%
WinoGrande—70.8%

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Math14141111
LiveBench Math—15.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Expert13951045
ARC (AI2) Challenge—84.9%
MMLU—68.8%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—64%

Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English13951021
LMArena Chinese14251021
LMArena Korean1406905
LMArena Russian13851022
LMArena French—1076
LMArena German—1044
LMArena Japanese—935
LMArena Spanish—1085

Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13741053
LiveBench Instruction Following—39.1%

Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query13841044

Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct
LMArena Text14011073
LMArena Creative Writing13921037
LMArena Multi-Turn13931018
LiveBench Language—9.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better for coding?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper