Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Llama 3.2 90B

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan T1 20250711 Tencent

42.5

Rank #114 Confirmed

Llama 3.2 90B Meta

27.5

Rank #331 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.7 to 11.1.
  • Llama 3.2 90B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index42.527.5
Released—2024-09-24
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked139

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Coding1390—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
BALROG—27.3%

Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
EnigmaEval—0.4%
LMArena Hard Prompts1399—
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.5

Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—2.6%
LMArena Math1414—
MATH Level 5—39.4%

Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
GPQA Diamond—41%
LMArena Expert1395—
MMLU—80.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: —, Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Vision—1000
GeoBench—52%

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Non-English1395—
LMArena Chinese1425—
LMArena Korean1406—
LMArena Russian1385—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Instruction Following1374—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Longer Query1384—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Llama 3.2 90B: —

BenchmarkHunyuan T1 20250711Llama 3.2 90B
LMArena Text1401—
LMArena Creative Writing1392—
LMArena Multi-Turn1393—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Llama 3.2 90B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.

Related comparisons

Go deeper