Model comparison
Hunyuan T1 20250711 vs Yi-34B
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.8 to 7.5.
- Yi-34B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 42.5 | 27.8 |
| Released | — | 2023-11-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.9 (#129), Yi-34B: 32.3 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1390 | 1112 |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 28.5 (#103), Yi-34B: 21.2 (#226)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1399 | 1104 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 71.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 117.39 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.7 (#130), Yi-34B: 21.6 (#282)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1414 | 1114 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 5.1% |
| GSM8K | — | 76% |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.8 (#141), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#309)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1395 | 1061 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 14.7% |
| MMLU | — | 76.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.2 (#112), Yi-34B: 29.7 (#264)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1395 | 1079 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1425 | 1176 |
| LMArena Korean | 1406 | 959 |
| LMArena Russian | 1385 | 1050 |
| LMArena French | — | 1081 |
| LMArena German | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 993 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1070 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.6 (#138), Yi-34B: 56.2 (#274)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1374 | 1091 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#128), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#264)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1384 | 1094 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.5 (#109), Yi-34B: 34.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | Yi-34B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1401 | 1129 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1392 | 1108 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | 1113 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 better than Yi-34B?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 27.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan T1 20250711 or Yi-34B better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan T1 20250711 and Yi-34B share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.