Model comparison
Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemini 1.0 Pro scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan T1 20250711 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 36.0 to 8.7.
Side by side
| Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 27.1 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2023-12-13 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 31.6 (#270), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1108 | 1389 |
| HumanEval+ | 55.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 61.4% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 16.4 (#292), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1109 | 1399 |
| DTBench | 45.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.97 | — |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 8.7 (#315), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1132 | 1414 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.2% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 15.5 (#286), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1059 | 1395 |
| GPQA Diamond | 34% | — |
| MMLU | 70% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 33.5 (#247), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1138 | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1124 | 1424 |
| LMArena Russian | 1186 | 1384 |
| LMArena French | 1144 | — |
| LMArena German | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1023 | — |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1118 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 57.9 (#262), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | 1375 |
Long Context Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 34.3 (#244), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1132 | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemini 1.0 Pro: 36.2 (#259), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemini 1.0 Pro | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1149 | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1130 | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1139 | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 27.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemini 1.0 Pro or Hunyuan T1 20250711 better for coding?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemini 1.0 Pro and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemini 1.0 Pro has 24 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.