Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Mistral Medium 3.1

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.2

Rank #193 Confirmed

Mistral Medium 3.1 Mistral AI

31.5

Rank #260 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 23.9 to 10.1.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Medium 3.1 specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
ProviderTencentMistral AI
Noometry Index37.231.5
Released——
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—131K
Max output—105K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked123

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Coding1270—

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.1 (#336)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
NYT Connections (extended)—6.5%
Thematic Generalization—20.3%
LMArena Hard Prompts1264—

Math Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Math1274—

Knowledge Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Expert1248—

Multilingual Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Non-English1262—
LMArena Chinese1319—
LMArena Russian1258—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Instruction Following1245—

Long Context Not comparable

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Mistral Medium 3.1: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Longer Query1301—

Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.6 (#140)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Mistral Medium 3.1
LMArena Text1274—
LMArena Creative Writing1242—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1476
LMArena Multi-Turn1275—

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Mistral Medium 3.1?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Mistral Medium 3.1 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper