Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 18.1.
- Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5.60 |
| Results tracked | 12 | 43 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 32.8 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1293 |
| WeirdML | — | 16% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45.8% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 55.9% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.0 (#124)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| TheAgentCompany | — | 5.7% |
| BALROG | — | 16.2% |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 35.8% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 21.4 (#197)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 1271 |
| DTBench | — | 62.9% |
| LMCA | — | 13.4% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 79.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 129.01 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.5 |
| HellaSwag | — | 84.8% |
| PIQA | — | 82.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 82.3% |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 18.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 1283 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 33% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 63.2% |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 26.9 (#247)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1245 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 49.1% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 63.1% |
| Confabulations | — | 19.1% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 42.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 94.5% |
| MMLU | — | 85.3% |
| TriviaQA | — | 71.9% |
Multilingual Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.2 (#208)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 1252 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | 1272 |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | 1264 |
| LMArena French | — | 1279 |
| LMArena German | — | 1234 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1180 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1188 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1255 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 1254 |
| IFEval | — | 80.6% |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#183)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1282 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.9 (#210)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen2.5 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 1269 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 1221 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 1272 |
| WildBench | — | 80.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 32.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.