Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3-4B
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 23.9 to 18.5.
- Qwen3-4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.2 | 31.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 35.7% |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 52.2% |
| LMArena Math | 1274 | — |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3-4B?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Qwen3-4B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.