Model comparison
Mistral Medium 3.1 vs Olmo 3.1 32b Think
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads 25.2 to 10.6.
- Olmo 3.1 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 31.9 | 37.9 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 105K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1291 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 10.6 (#341), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 6.5% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 20.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1272 |
Math Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1305 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1295 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1209 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1260 |
| LMArena German | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1193 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1289 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1247 |
Long Context Not comparable
Mistral Medium 3.1: —, Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1272 |
Writing & Preference Mistral Medium 3.1 leads
Mistral Medium 3.1: 55.5 (#145), Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220)
| Benchmark | Mistral Medium 3.1 | Olmo 3.1 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1226 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1476 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1252 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Mistral Medium 3.1 better than Olmo 3.1 32b Think?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Mistral Medium 3.1 and Olmo 3.1 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Medium 3.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15.