Model comparison
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 13b
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 8 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
MetaSummary
- They share 8 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 13b in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 47.2 to 13.8.
- Llama 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 24.4 |
| Released | — | 2023-02-24 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 683 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1264 | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.58 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1274 | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —, Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1262 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1319 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1258 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1245 | 781 |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 13b: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | — |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1274 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1242 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1275 | 753 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 13b?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 13b better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 13b share?
8 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.