Model comparison

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 vs Llama 2-70B

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 Tencent

37.9

Rank #193 Confirmed

Llama 2-70B Meta

24.4

Rank #349 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 35.6 to 8.1.
  • Llama 2-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-70B specifications
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.924.4
Released—2023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197), Llama 2-70B: 31.4 (#286)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Coding12701079

Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154), Llama 2-70B: 14.4 (#325)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12641073
DTBench—41.6%
BIG-Bench Hard—64.9%
CommonsenseQA 2.0—50%
Epoch Capabilities Index—113.79
ForecastBench—51.4
HellaSwag—85.3%
LAMBADA—78.9%
PIQA—82.8%
WinoGrande—80.2%

Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179), Llama 2-70B: 8.1 (#326)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Math12741091
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—0%
MATH Level 5—3.3%
GSM8K—69.6%

Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197), Llama 2-70B: 7.4 (#310)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Expert12481039
GPQA Diamond—26.3%
ARC (AI2) Challenge—78.3%
BoolQ—88.6%
MMLU—69.9%
OpenBookQA—60.2%
TriviaQA—87.6%

Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203), Llama 2-70B: 27.7 (#274)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Non-English12621045
LMArena Chinese1319995
LMArena Russian12581083
LMArena French—1090
LMArena German—1041
LMArena Japanese—927
LMArena Korean—964
LMArena Spanish—1143

Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219), Llama 2-70B: 54.9 (#278)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12451071

Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#270)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Longer Query13011062

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214), Llama 2-70B: 32.3 (#279)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Standard 2025 02 10Llama 2-70B
LMArena Text12741115
LMArena Creative Writing12421075
LMArena Multi-Turn12751088

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better than Llama 2-70B?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 24.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 or Llama 2-70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper