Model comparison
DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
DeepSeek
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.6 to 7.1.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2023-11-29 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1270 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1264 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
Multilingual Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1245 |
Long Context Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.5 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.