Model comparison
Claude 2 vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 33.0 to 8.7.
Side by side
| Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.7 | 37.2 |
| Released | 2023-07-11 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 36.5 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1270 |
| HumanEval+ | 61.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2: 20.8 (#213), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 23.9 (#157)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1264 |
| DTBench | 51.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 120.08 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2: 8.7 (#314), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.0 (#179)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 2.5% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1274 |
| MATH Level 5 | 11.7% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Claude 2: 17.0 (#282), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 33.6 (#192)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 34.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1248 |
| MMLU | 78.5% | — |
| TriviaQA | 87.5% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.9 (#198)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1262 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1258 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1245 |
Long Context Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Claude 2: —, Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.4 (#209)
| Benchmark | Claude 2 | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude 2 better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.2 to 24.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Claude 2 and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude 2 has 8 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.