Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 2-13B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Llama 2-13B Meta

29.6

Rank #309 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 2-13B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 48.7 to 29.8.
  • Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-13B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index38.629.6
Released—2023-07-18
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Coding13071062

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861051
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—42.2%
BIG-Bench Hard—58.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—106.17
HellaSwag—80.7%
LAMBADA—76.5%
PIQA—80.8%
WinoGrande—72.8%

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Math12811065
GSM8K—36.9%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Expert12761030
ARC (AI2) Challenge—60.3%
BoolQ—82.4%
MMLU—55.6%
OpenBookQA—57%
TriviaQA—79.6%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 2-13B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
ScienceQA—55.8%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Non-English12651024
LMArena Chinese13461001
LMArena Russian12661055
LMArena French—1044
LMArena German—1009
LMArena Japanese—894
LMArena Korean—953
LMArena Spanish—1087

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Instruction Following12771045

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Longer Query13411064

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 2-13B
LMArena Text12881084
LMArena Creative Writing12641047
LMArena Multi-Turn12841050

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 2-13B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 2-13B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 2-13B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-13B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper