Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 29.0 to 12.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is DTBench: 42.2% for Llama 2-13B and 77.1% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- Llama 2-13B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| DTBench | 42.2% | 77.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1065 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | — |
| LMArena French | 1044 | — |
| LMArena German | 1009 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.