Model comparison
Llama 2-13B vs Trinity Large Thinking
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Meta
Arcee AISummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Llama 2-13B scores higher in 0 categories and Trinity Large Thinking in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 53.8 to 29.8.
Side by side
| Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | Arcee AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.6 | 38.6 |
| Released | 2023-07-18 | 2026-04-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 80K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.25 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 32 | 24 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 30.9 (#291), Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1062 | 1381 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1238 |
| SciCode | — | 36.1% |
Reasoning Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 12.8 (#337), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1051 | 1350 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 16.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0.9% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 41.6% |
| DTBench | 42.2% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 58.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 106.17 | — |
| HellaSwag | 80.7% | — |
| LAMBADA | 76.5% | — |
| PIQA | 80.8% | — |
| WinoGrande | 72.8% | — |
Math Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 31.1 (#229), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1065 | 1366 |
| GSM8K | 36.9% | — |
Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 28.1 (#249), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1030 | 1360 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 6.9% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 60.3% | — |
| BoolQ | 82.4% | — |
| MMLU | 55.6% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 57% | — |
| TriviaQA | 79.6% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Llama 2-13B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: —
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | 55.8% | — |
Multilingual Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 26.5 (#279), Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1024 | 1325 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1001 | 1373 |
| LMArena French | 1044 | 1374 |
| LMArena German | 1009 | 1356 |
| LMArena Japanese | 894 | 1311 |
| LMArena Korean | 953 | 1306 |
| LMArena Russian | 1055 | 1337 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1087 | 1357 |
Instruction Following Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 53.3 (#287), Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1045 | 1334 |
Long Context Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 32.3 (#269), Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1064 | 1355 |
Writing & Preference Trinity Large Thinking leads
Llama 2-13B: 29.8 (#289), Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Llama 2-13B | Trinity Large Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1047 | 1320 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1050 | 1342 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Llama 2-13B better than Trinity Large Thinking?
Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Llama 2-13B or Trinity Large Thinking better for coding?
Trinity Large Thinking scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Llama 2-13B and Trinity Large Thinking share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Llama 2-13B has 32 scored results on Noometry and Trinity Large Thinking has 24.