Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Llama 3.1-70B

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.6

Rank #184 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-70B Meta

29.6

Rank #308 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-70B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads 35.8 to 13.5.
  • Llama 3.1-70B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.1-70B specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index38.629.6
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1235

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 38.2 (#181), Llama 3.1-70B: 30.3 (#296)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Coding13071260
WeirdML—9%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.1%
BigCodeBench Complete—54.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Llama 3.1-70B: 25.1 (#112)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
TheAgentCompany—6.9%
BALROG—27.9%

Reasoning Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 25.5 (#148), Llama 3.1-70B: 21.6 (#220)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Hard Prompts12861241
DTBench—60%
LMCA—14.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—125.92

Math Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.8 (#178), Llama 3.1-70B: 13.5 (#304)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Math12811252
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—3.6%
Omni-MATH—21%
MATH Level 5—36.7%

Knowledge Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.1-70B: 24.2 (#269)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Expert12761209
GPQA Diamond—44.2%
MMLU-Pro—65.3%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
MMLU—80.1%

Multilingual Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.0 (#200), Llama 3.1-70B: 38.8 (#225)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Non-English12651219
LMArena Chinese13461215
LMArena Russian12661234
LMArena French—1261
LMArena German—1222
LMArena Japanese—1132
LMArena Korean—1140
LMArena Spanish—1253

Instruction Following Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.3 (#197), Llama 3.1-70B: 65.3 (#223)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Instruction Following12771231
IFEval—82.1%

Long Context Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#149), Llama 3.1-70B: 37.6 (#214)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Longer Query13411241

Writing & Preference Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.7 (#197), Llama 3.1-70B: 35.4 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Llama 3.1-70B
LMArena Text12881261
LMArena Creative Writing12641232
LMArena Multi-Turn12841256
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—784
WildBench—75.8%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Llama 3.1-70B?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 29.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Llama 3.1-70B better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.2 versus 30.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Llama 3.1-70B share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-70B has 35.

Related comparisons

Go deeper