Model comparison

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 vs Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 Tencent

38.0

Rank #183 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

42.3

Rank #105 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.5-Flash in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5-Flash leads 58.2 to 48.9.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5-Flash specifications
Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.042.3
Released—2026-02-23
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.40
Results tracked1232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 37.6 (#177), Qwen3.5-Flash: 33.9 (#234)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Coding13071412
LMArena WebDev—1243
ALE-Bench—221.8

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: —, Qwen3.5-Flash: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
Vending-Bench 2—462.69

Reasoning Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 24.5 (#147), Qwen3.5-Flash: 32.9 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Hard Prompts12861404
Chess Puzzles—21%
Mystery Game Puzzles—20%
DTBench—82.9%
LMCA—29.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.98

Math Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 33.1 (#178), Qwen3.5-Flash: 36.3 (#117)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Math12811407
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—18.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—84.4%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—6.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 34.5 (#188), Qwen3.5-Flash: 43.2 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Expert12761408
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
SimpleQA Verified—20.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 42.1 (#195), Qwen3.5-Flash: 50.7 (#116)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Non-English12651385
LMArena Chinese13461446
LMArena Russian12661379
LMArena French—1412
LMArena German—1389
LMArena Japanese—1369
LMArena Korean—1344
LMArena Spanish—1399

Instruction Following Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 67.6 (#192), Qwen3.5-Flash: 72.8 (#133)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Instruction Following12771374

Long Context Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 40.8 (#144), Qwen3.5-Flash: 42.4 (#119)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Longer Query13421392

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5-Flash leads

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10: 48.9 (#191), Qwen3.5-Flash: 58.2 (#117)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large 2025 02 10Qwen3.5-Flash
LMArena Text12881397
LMArena Creative Writing12641343
LMArena Multi-Turn12841393

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 better than Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen3.5-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 38.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 or Qwen3.5-Flash better for coding?

Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.6 versus 33.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 and Qwen3.5-Flash share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large 2025 02 10 has 12 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-Flash has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper