Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.0

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.1 to 32.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.056.0
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1338

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Qwen3.8 Max: 52.3 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding13071499
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1671
FrontierSWE—15.8%
SciCode—52.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 42.6 (#17)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12571493
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.69

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1 (#15)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12691498
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#25)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12501504
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Qwen3.8 Max: 36.9 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision11801314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.6 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12361468
LMArena Chinese12891537
LMArena Russian12431478
LMArena French—1502
LMArena German—1489
LMArena Japanese—1466
LMArena Korean—1467
LMArena Spanish—1495

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.7 (#19)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12501478

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.5 (#30)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12791486

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.0 (#31)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12631480
LMArena Creative Writing12501478
LMArena Multi-Turn12531487

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.3 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.8 Max share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper