Noometry

Model comparison

Grok 4.5 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.5 xAI

55.0

Rank #22 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.5 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.5 leads 56.0 to 23.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index55.037.0
Released2026-07-08—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked5213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14731307
DeepSWE53.8%—
FrontierCode42.4%—
LMArena WebDev1552—
SciCode54.1%—
WeirdML46.4%—
ALE-Bench1,309—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
APEX-Agents56.2%—
τ²-bench Banking47.9%—
PostTrainBench23.4%—
GBAEval65.4%—
GDP.pdf14%—
LMArena Search1213—
Vending-Bench 23,887—

Reasoning Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14621257
ARC-AGI-252.6%—
SimpleBench70%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark83.5%—
NYT Connections (extended)79.9%—
ARC-AGI-187.2%—
CritPt15.4%—
Chess Puzzles36%—
DTBench96.5%—
LMCA45.2%—
Surface Evolver Bench74.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index154.02—

Math Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14571269
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)57.2%—
FrontierMath Tier 424.4%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202597.8%—
ProofBench31%—

Knowledge Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14661250
GPQA Diamond93.4%—
SimpleQA Verified48.3%—

Multimodal Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12871180
Blueprint-Bench 227.3%—
Furniture Assembly22.5%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14391236
LMArena Chinese14971289
LMArena Russian14471243
LMArena French1458—
LMArena German1448—
LMArena Japanese1425—
LMArena Korean1402—
LMArena Spanish1452—

Instruction Following Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14461250

Long Context Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14631279

Writing & Preference Grok 4.5 leads

Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)

BenchmarkGrok 4.5Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14481263
LMArena Creative Writing14421250
LMArena Multi-Turn14571253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1579—

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.5 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Grok 4.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 55.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.5 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.7 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.5 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.5 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper