Model comparison

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 xAI

37.0

Rank #196 Confirmed

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.0

Rank #21 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.1 to 32.8.

Side by side

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
ProviderxAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.056.0
Released2024-08-132026-08-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1738

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194), Qwen3.8 Max: 52.3 (#30)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding12691499
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1671
FrontierSWE—15.8%
SciCode—52.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 42.6 (#17)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts12551493
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.69

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1 (#15)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math12651498
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#25)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Expert12381504
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 36.9 (#70)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.6 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English12571468
LMArena Chinese12621537
LMArena French12851502
LMArena German12731489
LMArena Japanese12131466
LMArena Korean11951467
LMArena Russian12611478
LMArena Spanish12781495

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.7 (#19)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following12451478

Long Context Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191), Qwen3.8 Max: 45.5 (#30)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query12671486

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.0 (#31)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 2 Mini 2024 08 13Qwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text12811480
LMArena Creative Writing12421478
LMArena Multi-Turn12651487

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 52.3 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 and Qwen3.8 Max share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 38.

Related comparisons

Go deeper