Model comparison

Grok 4.6 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Grok 4.6 xAI

56.9

Rank #21 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.6 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok 4.6 leads 61.4 to 24.8.

Side by side

Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Large Vision specifications
Grok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderxAITencent
Noometry Index56.937.6
Released2026-08-12—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window500K—
Max output500K—
Input $ / M tokens$2—
Output $ / M tokens$6—
Results tracked4913

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14651308
DeepSWE67.5%—
FrontierCode48%—
CursorBench41.4%—
LMArena WebDev1617—
FrontierSWE25.3%—
SciCode56.5%—
WeirdML67.3%—
ALE-Bench1,508—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
APEX-Agents65.3%—
GDP.pdf17.2%—
Vending-Bench 29,047—

Reasoning Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14471257
ARC-AGI-267.1%—
SimpleBench75.9%—
NYT Connections (extended)80%—
ARC-AGI-187.5%—
CritPt19.7%—
Chess Puzzles40%—
EBR-Bench30.5%—
Mystery Game Puzzles34%—
DTBench97.3%—
LMCA48.5%—
Epoch Capabilities Index156.44—

Math Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14231268
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)66%—
FrontierMath Tier 431.7%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202599.2%—
ProofBench51%—

Knowledge Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14671252
GPQA Diamond94%—
SimpleQA Verified49.3%—

Multimodal Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision12631180
Blueprint-Bench 233.2%—
Furniture Assembly40%—
LMArena Document1452—

Multilingual Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14201236
LMArena Chinese14801287
LMArena Russian14221243
LMArena French1461—
LMArena German1431—
LMArena Japanese1376—
LMArena Korean1397—
LMArena Spanish1404—

Instruction Following Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14311251

Long Context Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14541280

Writing & Preference Grok 4.6 leads

Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGrok 4.6Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14281263
LMArena Creative Writing14281248
LMArena Multi-Turn14251254

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok 4.6 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Grok 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.9 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Grok 4.6 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Grok 4.6 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.6 has 49 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper