Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Plus leads 56.1 to 33.7.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderTencentAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.047.3
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked1337

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Coding13071467
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts12571449
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.67

Math Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Math12691450
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Expert12501456
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%

Multimodal Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Qwen3.6 Plus: —

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Vision1180—

Multilingual Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English12361424
LMArena Chinese12891478
LMArena Russian12431434
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1451
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1381
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following12501425

Long Context Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Longer Query12791440
CL-bench—20.3%

Writing & Preference Qwen3.6 Plus leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text12631437
LMArena Creative Writing12501405
LMArena Multi-Turn12531438

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.3 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen3.6 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper