Noometry

Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Kimi K2.6 Moonshot AI

47.7

Rank #60 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 1 category and Kimi K2.6 in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Kimi K2.6 leads 68.5 to 46.5.
  • Kimi K2.6 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
ProviderTencentMoonshot AI
Noometry Index37.647.7
Released—2026-04-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.95
Output $ / M tokens—$4
Results tracked1351

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Kimi K2.6: 50.7 (#43)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Coding13081488
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1509
SciCode—53.5%
WeirdML—55.9%
ALE-Bench—1,093

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Kimi K2.6: 21.9 (#137)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
OSWorld 2.0—4.6%
ExploitBench—18.4%
GBAEval—0.9%
GDP.pdf—12%
Vending-Bench 2—6,205

Reasoning Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Kimi K2.6: 40.5 (#55)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Hard Prompts12571470
NYT Connections (extended)—87.2%
CritPt—8%
Chess Puzzles—26%
EBR-Bench—2.4%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—90.9%
LMCA—37.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—151.05

Math Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Kimi K2.6: 57.0 (#41)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Math12681475
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—57.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4—25.6%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—72.9%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—96.1%
ProofBench—16%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—39%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—14.6%

Knowledge Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Kimi K2.6: 54.0 (#54)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Expert12521491
GPQA Diamond—90.8%
SimpleQA Verified—34.9%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.8%

Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Kimi K2.6: 31.6 (#103)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Vision11801283
Blueprint-Bench 2—3.9%
Furniture Assembly—21.7%
LMArena Document—1451

Multilingual Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Kimi K2.6: 54.9 (#37)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Non-English12361446
LMArena Chinese12871521
LMArena Russian12431446
LMArena French—1471
LMArena German—1450
LMArena Japanese—1443
LMArena Korean—1427
LMArena Spanish—1464

Instruction Following Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Kimi K2.6: 76.3 (#43)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Instruction Following12511451

Long Context Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Kimi K2.6: 44.9 (#52)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Longer Query12801468

Writing & Preference Kimi K2.6 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Kimi K2.6: 68.5 (#26)

BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionKimi K2.6
LMArena Text12631455
LMArena Creative Writing12481434
LMArena Multi-Turn12541453
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1725
EQ-Bench 4—1202

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Kimi K2.6?

Kimi K2.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.7 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Kimi K2.6 better for coding?

Kimi K2.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.7 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Kimi K2.6 share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2.6 has 51.

Related comparisons

Go deeper