Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs o3

o3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 11, 2026. 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision

Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

o3 OpenAI

47.5

Rank #61 Confirmed

Summary

They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and o3 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
The widest gap is in knowledge, where o3 leads 54.6 to 34.4.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and o3 specifications
	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
Provider	Tencent	OpenAI
Noometry Index	37.6	47.5
Released	—	2025-04-16
Weights	Proprietary	Proprietary
Context window	—	200K
Max output	—	100K
Input $ / M tokens	—	$2
Output $ / M tokens	—	$8
Results tracked	13	63

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), o3: 46.8 (#64)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Coding	1308	1408
SWE-bench Verified	—	62.3%
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)	—	58.4%
Aider Polyglot	—	81.3%
GSO	—	8.8%
WeirdML	—	52.4%
CadEval	—	74%
ALE-Bench	—	933.55

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, o3: 34.5 (#44)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	—	63%
GDPval	—	30.8%
DeepResearch Bench	—	45.2%
OSWorld	—	23%
LMArena Search	—	1144
METR Time Horizons	—	65.4%

Reasoning o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), o3: 32.0 (#78)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Hard Prompts	1257	1402
ARC-AGI-2	—	6.5%
SimpleBench	—	53.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark	—	67.6%
ARC-AGI-1	—	60.8%
CritPt	—	1.4%
Chess Puzzles	—	38%
EnigmaEval	—	13.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles	—	29%
DTBench	—	84.8%
LMCA	—	39.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index	—	146.86
ForecastBench	—	62.5

Math o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), o3: 50.2 (#58)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Math	1268	1426
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)	—	33.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	—	84.4%
Omni-MATH	—	71.4%
MATH Level 5	—	97.8%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)	—	18.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)	—	2.1%

Knowledge o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), o3: 54.6 (#52)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Expert	1252	1402
GPQA Diamond	—	81.8%
Humanity's Last Exam	—	20.3%
SimpleQA Verified	—	49.4%
MMLU-Pro	—	85.9%
Confabulations	—	14.4%
GPQA (HELM)	—	75.3%

Multimodal o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), o3: 41.4 (#36)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Vision	1180	1214
GeoBench	—	74%
VPCT	—	52%

Multilingual o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), o3: 51.7 (#105)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Non-English	1236	1401
LMArena Chinese	1287	1437
LMArena Russian	1243	1406
LMArena French	—	1430
LMArena German	—	1420
LMArena Japanese	—	1403
LMArena Korean	—	1370
LMArena Spanish	—	1395

Instruction Following o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), o3: 72.8 (#127)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Instruction Following	1251	1368
IFEval	—	86.9%

Long Context o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), o3: 53.3 (#6)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Longer Query	1280	1372
Fiction.LiveBench	—	88.9%
CL-bench	—	17.8%

Writing & Preference o3 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), o3: 63.5 (#64)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Hunyuan Large Vision	o3
LMArena Text	1263	1410
LMArena Creative Writing	1248	1359
LMArena Multi-Turn	1254	1405
Short-Story Creative Writing	—	83.9%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing	—	1676
WildBench	—	86.1%

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than o3?