Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

MiMo-V2.6-Pro Xiaomi

50.3

Rank #49 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.6-Pro in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads 66.8 to 46.5.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
ProviderTencentXiaomi
Noometry Index37.650.3
Released—2026-09-21
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.43
Output $ / M tokens—$0.87
Results tracked1319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 55.5 (#23)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Coding13081534
LMArena WebDev—1629
SciCode—60.9%
ALE-Bench—1,158

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 37.5 (#35)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
APEX-Agents—59.5%

Reasoning MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.1 (#50)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Hard Prompts12571512
CritPt—26.6%

Math MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 54.5 (#45)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Math12681494
ProofBench—70%

Knowledge MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 43.5 (#92)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Expert12521543

Multimodal MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 40.8 (#43)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Vision11801264

Multilingual MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 56.9 (#14)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Non-English12361474
LMArena Chinese12871529
LMArena Russian12431480

Instruction Following MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 78.2 (#12)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Instruction Following12511493

Long Context MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 46.0 (#27)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Longer Query12801501

Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), MiMo-V2.6-Pro: 66.8 (#33)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMiMo-V2.6-Pro
LMArena Text12631492
LMArena Creative Writing12481468
LMArena Multi-Turn12541464

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or MiMo-V2.6-Pro better for coding?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.5 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and MiMo-V2.6-Pro share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper