Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 34.4.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |
Reasoning Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1268 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Qwen3.6 Flash leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.