Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Hunyuan Large Vision
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher in 7 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where GLM-4.7-Flash leads 46.8 to 40.1.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 38.4 | 37.0 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 131K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 21 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.0 (#133), Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | 1307 |
Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.2 (#224), Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | 1257 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
Math GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 34.4 (#159), Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1354 | 1269 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
Knowledge GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.4 (#177), Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | 1250 |
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1180 |
Multilingual GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.8 (#152), Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1331 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | 1289 |
| LMArena Russian | 1333 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1336 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1284 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1351 | — |
Instruction Following GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.3 (#162), Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | 1250 |
Long Context GLM-4.7-Flash leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#143), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | 1279 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.7 (#206), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | 1250 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | 1253 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.4 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
GLM-4.7-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.