Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 8 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 38.8 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1308 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1299 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1268 | 1298 |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1252 | 1289 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1287 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1251 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1280 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1254 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.3 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.