Model comparison
Hunyuan Large Vision vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Tencent
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Olmo 3 32b Think in 8 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 37.0 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1307 | 1318 |
Reasoning Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1257 | 1302 |
Math Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1269 | 1315 |
Knowledge Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1250 | 1272 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1180 | — |
Multilingual Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1236 | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1289 | 1300 |
| LMArena Russian | 1243 | 1255 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
Instruction Following Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1250 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1279 | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 3 32b Think leads
Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Hunyuan Large Vision | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1263 | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1250 | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1253 | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.6 vs 38.0); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.