Model comparison

GLM-5.1 vs Hunyuan Large Vision

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

GLM-5.1 Z.ai (Zhipu)

47.8

Rank #59 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. GLM-5.1 scores higher in 8 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GLM-5.1 leads 54.9 to 34.4.
  • GLM-5.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

GLM-5.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision specifications
GLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
ProviderZ.ai (Zhipu)Tencent
Noometry Index47.837.6
Released2026-04-07—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window200K—
Max output131K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.40—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked4113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 48.7 (#55), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding14851308
SWE-bench Verified74.2%—
LMArena WebDev1508—
SciCode43.8%—
WeirdML57.1%—
ALE-Bench887.1—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GLM-5.1: 24.9 (#113), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
APEX-Agents40.9%—
ExploitBench18.1%—
GBAEval0%—
Vending-Bench 25,634—

Reasoning GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 39.1 (#60), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts14721257
SimpleBench55.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)77.7%—
CritPt4.6%—
Chess Puzzles19%—
Thematic Generalization69.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index149.84—

Math GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 49.7 (#60), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math14731268
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)36.8%—
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions67.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202593.3%—
ProofBench22.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)33.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)12.5%—

Knowledge GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 54.9 (#50), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert14761252
GPQA Diamond89.9%—
SimpleQA Verified34%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GLM-5.1: —, Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision—1180

Multilingual GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 55.0 (#36), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English14471236
LMArena Chinese15151287
LMArena Russian14541243
LMArena French1474—
LMArena German1465—
LMArena Japanese1434—
LMArena Korean1418—
LMArena Spanish1469—

Instruction Following GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 76.3 (#42), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following14511251

Long Context GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 44.9 (#53), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query14661280

Writing & Preference GLM-5.1 leads

GLM-5.1: 66.9 (#31), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGLM-5.1Hunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text14611263
LMArena Creative Writing14531248
LMArena Multi-Turn14721254
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1592—

Frequently asked questions

Is GLM-5.1 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

GLM-5.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 47.8 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is GLM-5.1 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

GLM-5.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GLM-5.1 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-5.1 has 41 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper