Model comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.6 vs Hunyuan Large Vision
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
TencentSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher in 9 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 0 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads 70.2 to 46.5.
Side by side
| Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 50.3 | 37.6 |
| Released | 2026-02-17 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $3 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $15 | — |
| Results tracked | 57 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.3 (#67), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1504 | 1308 |
| SWE-bench Verified | 75.2% | — |
| DeepSWE | 29.9% | — |
| FrontierCode | 24.3% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | 1522 | — |
| SciCode | 46.8% | — |
| WeirdML | 66.1% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 1,327 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 39.1 (#28), Hunyuan Large Vision: —
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | 53.4% | — |
| APEX-Agents | 43% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | 9.3% | — |
| DeepResearch Bench | 54.9% | — |
| OSWorld | 72.1% | — |
| ExploitBench | 23.6% | — |
| GBAEval | 48.8% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 18% | — |
| LMArena Search | 1221 | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 7,204 | — |
Reasoning Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 46.1 (#45), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1484 | 1257 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 60.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 80.9% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 86.5% | — |
| CritPt | 3.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 13% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | 76.3% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 16% | — |
| DTBench | 89.9% | — |
| LMCA | 46.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 152.24 | — |
| ForecastBench | 62 | — |
Math Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 52.9 (#49), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1462 | 1268 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 85.8% | — |
| ProofBench | 45% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 32.4% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 8.3% | — |
Knowledge Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 51.7 (#65), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1500 | 1252 |
| GPQA Diamond | 87.4% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 35.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 10.6% | — |
Multimodal Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 38.0 (#68), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1283 | 1180 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 6.7% | — |
| LMArena Document | 1482 | — |
Multilingual Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 54.4 (#41), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1440 | 1236 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1491 | 1287 |
| LMArena Russian | 1440 | 1243 |
| LMArena French | 1465 | — |
| LMArena German | 1428 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1411 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1464 | — |
Instruction Following Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 77.4 (#25), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1475 | 1251 |
Long Context Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 45.3 (#44), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1479 | 1280 |
Writing & Preference Claude Sonnet 4.6 leads
Claude Sonnet 4.6: 70.2 (#22), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)
| Benchmark | Claude Sonnet 4.6 | Hunyuan Large Vision |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1458 | 1263 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1435 | 1248 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1464 | 1254 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1810 | — |
| EQ-Bench 4 | 1207 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 better than Hunyuan Large Vision?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 is the stronger model overall, scoring 50.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Claude Sonnet 4.6 or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.3 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Claude Sonnet 4.6 and Hunyuan Large Vision share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Claude Sonnet 4.6 has 57 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.