Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Muse Spark 1.2

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.0

Rank #198 Confirmed

Muse Spark 1.2 Meta

49.8

Rank #44 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Spark 1.2 in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Muse Spark 1.2 leads 50.4 to 23.8.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Muse Spark 1.2 specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
ProviderTencentMeta
Noometry Index37.049.8
Released—2026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1.05M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.25
Output $ / M tokens—$4.25
Results tracked1328

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 37.6 (#176), Muse Spark 1.2: 48.6 (#49)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Coding13071497
DeepSWE—54.9%
LMArena WebDev—1532
FrontierSWE—12%
SciCode—56.4%
WeirdML—60.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Hunyuan Large Vision: —, Muse Spark 1.2: 29.5 (#77)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
APEX-Agents—36.4%
GDP.pdf—16%

Reasoning Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 23.8 (#160), Muse Spark 1.2: 50.4 (#32)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Hard Prompts12571490
SimpleBench—74.5%
NYT Connections (extended)—79.2%
CritPt—17.7%
DTBench—94.7%
LMCA—48.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—155.18

Math Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 32.8 (#184), Muse Spark 1.2: 43.8 (#68)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
ProofBench—43%
LMArena Math1269—

Knowledge Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 33.7 (#191), Muse Spark 1.2: 53.9 (#49)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Expert12501485
SimpleQA Verified—60.3%

Multimodal Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.1 (#79), Muse Spark 1.2: 42.6 (#24)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Vision11801304

Multilingual Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 40.1 (#216), Muse Spark 1.2: 57.4 (#10)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Non-English12361479
LMArena Chinese12891519
LMArena Russian12431494

Instruction Following Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 66.0 (#210), Muse Spark 1.2: 77.1 (#30)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Instruction Following12501466

Long Context Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.8 (#184), Muse Spark 1.2: 45.4 (#35)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Longer Query12791483

Writing & Preference Muse Spark 1.2 leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.7 (#211), Muse Spark 1.2: 72.6 (#14)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionMuse Spark 1.2
LMArena Text12631486
LMArena Creative Writing12501444
LMArena Multi-Turn12531504
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1840

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 49.8 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Muse Spark 1.2 better for coding?

Muse Spark 1.2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.6 versus 37.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Muse Spark 1.2 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Muse Spark 1.2 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper