Model comparison

Hunyuan Large Vision vs Inkling-Small

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher in 0 categories and Inkling-Small in 9 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 34.4.
  • Inkling-Small has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Hunyuan Large Vision and Inkling-Small specifications
Hunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
ProviderTencentThinking Machines Lab
Noometry Index37.646.5
Released—2026-07-15
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—524K
Max output—1.05M
Input $ / M tokens—$0.45
Output $ / M tokens—$1.20
Results tracked1333

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180), Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Coding13081451
LMArena WebDev—1409
SciCode—48.7%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158), Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Hard Prompts12571423
ARC-AGI-2—40.1%
ARC-AGI-1—84%
CritPt—8.3%
Chess Puzzles—18%
Mystery Game Puzzles—6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—150.15

Math Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183), Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Math12681459
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—46.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—17.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—90%
ProofBench—6%

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196), Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Expert12521442
GPQA Diamond—88.5%
SimpleQA Verified—19.1%

Multimodal Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83), Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Vision11801235

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221), Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Non-English12361402
LMArena Chinese12871465
LMArena Russian12431391
LMArena French—1436
LMArena German—1405
LMArena Japanese—1405
LMArena Korean—1363
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215), Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Instruction Following12511399

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189), Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Longer Query12801401

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218), Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkHunyuan Large VisionInkling-Small
LMArena Text12631414
LMArena Creative Writing12481331
LMArena Multi-Turn12541418
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1491

Frequently asked questions

Is Hunyuan Large Vision better than Inkling-Small?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Hunyuan Large Vision or Inkling-Small better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Hunyuan Large Vision and Inkling-Small share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Hunyuan Large Vision has 13 scored results on Noometry and Inkling-Small has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper