Model comparison

Inkling-Small vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Inkling-Small Thinking Machines Lab

46.5

Rank #63 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Inkling-Small scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Inkling-Small leads 48.2 to 34.1.

Side by side

Inkling-Small and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct specifications
Inkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
ProviderThinking Machines LabNVIDIA
Noometry Index46.537.6
Released2026-07-152024-12-18
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window524K—
Max output1.05M—
Input $ / M tokens$0.45—
Output $ / M tokens$1.20—
Results tracked3314

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 43.6 (#85), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.9 (#216)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Coding14511272
LMArena WebDev1409—
SciCode48.7%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—38.7%
BigCodeBench Complete—48.2%

Reasoning Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 38.6 (#63), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 25.0 (#152)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts14231266
ARC-AGI-240.1%—
ARC-AGI-184%—
CritPt8.3%—
Chess Puzzles18%—
Mystery Game Puzzles6%—
Epoch Capabilities Index150.15—

Math Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 45.1 (#77), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 35.5 (#182)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Math14591271
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)46.3%—
FrontierMath Tier 417.1%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202590%—
ProofBench6%—

Knowledge Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 48.2 (#77), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 34.1 (#199)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Expert14421242
GPQA Diamond88.5%—
SimpleQA Verified19.1%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Inkling-Small: 39.1 (#62), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Vision1235—

Multilingual Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 51.7 (#104), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 40.5 (#217)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Non-English14021245
LMArena Chinese14651263
LMArena Russian13911227
LMArena French1436—
LMArena German1405—
LMArena Japanese1405—
LMArena Korean1363—
LMArena Spanish1428—

Instruction Following Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 73.8 (#114), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 65.9 (#213)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following13991252

Long Context Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 42.7 (#118), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 37.6 (#215)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query14011238

Writing & Preference Inkling-Small leads

Inkling-Small: 59.6 (#107), Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct: 48.4 (#203)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkInkling-SmallLlama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct
LMArena Text14141283
LMArena Creative Writing13311269
LMArena Multi-Turn14181275
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1491—

Frequently asked questions

Is Inkling-Small better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct?

Inkling-Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.5 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

Is Inkling-Small or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct better for coding?

Inkling-Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.6 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Inkling-Small and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Inkling-Small has 33 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper