Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Qwen3.6 Flash
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 29.0.
- Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper at $0.19 / $1.13 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Qwen3.6 Flash accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 256K.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.4 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-04-27 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 256K | 1M |
| Max output | 256K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.19 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | $1.13 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129), Qwen3.6 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77), Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 20% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 143.26 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Grok Build 0.1 or Qwen3.6 Flash?
Qwen3.6 Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.19 per million input tokens and $1.13 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.6 Flash does, with 1M tokens against 256K.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Qwen3.6 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.