Model comparison
GLM-4.7-Flash vs Grok Build 0.1
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 32.2 to 20.9.
- GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper at $0.06 / $0.40 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2 for Grok Build 0.1.
- Grok Build 0.1 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 200K.
- GLM-4.7-Flash has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2026-01-19 | 2026-04-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 256K |
| Max output | 131K | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.06 | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.40 | $2 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.6 (#135), Grok Build 0.1: 43.1 (#91)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 50.2% |
| LMArena Coding | 1383 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: —, Grok Build 0.1: 22.7 (#129)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | — | 2.4% |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
GLM-4.7-Flash: 20.9 (#229), Grok Build 0.1: 32.2 (#77)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 9.1% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1356 | — |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 36.1 (#173), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 58.3% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1355 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 35.5 (#184), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 60.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 9.3% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1357 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 46.5 (#158), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1403 | — |
| LMArena French | 1332 | — |
| LMArena German | 1337 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1332 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1350 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 70.1 (#167), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1327 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 40.9 (#148), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1345 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.7-Flash: 47.4 (#210), Grok Build 0.1: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.7-Flash | Grok Build 0.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1351 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1297 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1125 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1342 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.7-Flash better than Grok Build 0.1?
GLM-4.7-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 36.4 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok Build 0.1?
GLM-4.7-Flash is cheaper. It lists at $0.06 per million input tokens and $0.40 per million output tokens; Grok Build 0.1 lists at $1 and $2.
Is GLM-4.7-Flash or Grok Build 0.1 better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.1 versus 40.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok Build 0.1 does, with 256K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.7-Flash and Grok Build 0.1 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.7-Flash has 21 scored results on Noometry and Grok Build 0.1 has 3.