Model comparison
Grok Build 0.1 vs Olmo 3 32b Think
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Grok Build 0.1 leads 31.3 to 24.9.
- Olmo 3 32b Think has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 35.8 | 38.1 |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 256K | — |
| Max output | 256K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 42.5 (#90), Olmo 3 32b Think: 38.0 (#169)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 50.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1318 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: 22.5 (#122), Olmo 3 32b Think: —
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| GBAEval | 2.4% | — |
Reasoning Grok Build 0.1 leads
Grok Build 0.1: 31.3 (#73), Olmo 3 32b Think: 24.9 (#138)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 9.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1302 |
Math Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 33.8 (#165)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1315 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 34.4 (#189)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1272 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 41.4 (#205)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena French | — | 1291 |
| LMArena German | — | 1290 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1255 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 67.4 (#193)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1275 |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 39.4 (#177)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1296 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok Build 0.1: —, Olmo 3 32b Think: 49.2 (#188)
| Benchmark | Grok Build 0.1 | Olmo 3 32b Think |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1256 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1289 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok Build 0.1 better than Olmo 3 32b Think?
Olmo 3 32b Think is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 35.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok Build 0.1 or Olmo 3 32b Think better for coding?
Grok Build 0.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 38.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Grok Build 0.1 and Olmo 3 32b Think share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok Build 0.1 has 3 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3 32b Think has 14.