Model comparison
Grok 4.7 vs Laguna M.1
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
PoolsideSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Grok 4.7 scores higher in 3 categories and Laguna M.1 in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Grok 4.7 leads 57.8 to 21.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ProofBench: 34% for Grok 4.7 and 0% for Laguna M.1.
- Grok 4.7 accepts more context: 500K tokens versus 262K.
- Laguna M.1 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | xAI | Poolside |
| Noometry Index | 53.1 | 32.5 |
| Released | 2026-09-21 | 2026-04-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 500K | 262K |
| Max output | 500K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $2 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6 | — |
| Results tracked | 39 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 58.0 (#18), Laguna M.1: 36.6 (#204)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1639 | 1349 |
| FrontierCode | 47.6% | — |
| CursorBench | 46.3% | — |
| FrontierSWE | 29.5% | — |
| SciCode | 57.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 36.7 (#37), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 54.6% | — |
| GDP.pdf | 22.8% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 10,537 | — |
Reasoning Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 49.1 (#40), Laguna M.1: 23.1 (#184)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | 76.8% | — |
| CritPt | 18% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 38% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1413 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | 29% | — |
| DTBench | 96% | — |
| LMCA | 49.4% | — |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 15.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 153.53 | — |
Math Grok 4.7 leads
Grok 4.7: 57.8 (#39), Laguna M.1: 21.1 (#283)
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| ProofBench | 34% | 0% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 53% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 17.1% | — |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 98.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1407 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 62.8 (#22), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 92.7% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | 56% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1422 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 35.5 (#87), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1228 | — |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | 32.5% | — |
| Furniture Assembly | 20.8% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 50.8 (#116), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1389 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1455 | — |
| LMArena French | 1455 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1397 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1400 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 74.1 (#105), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 43.1 (#104), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1413 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Grok 4.7: 70.0 (#24), Laguna M.1: —
| Benchmark | Grok 4.7 | Laguna M.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1399 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1391 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 2007 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1393 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Grok 4.7 better than Laguna M.1?
Grok 4.7 is the stronger model overall, scoring 53.1 to 32.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Grok 4.7 or Laguna M.1 better for coding?
Grok 4.7 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Grok 4.7 does, with 500K tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Grok 4.7 and Laguna M.1 share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Grok 4.7 has 39 scored results on Noometry and Laguna M.1 has 3.